In some limited cases, close paraphrasing may be an acceptable way of writing an article. Names or titles of people, organizations, books, films and so on may be given in full — there is no creative expression in a name or title, which is often the only way to identify the subject. write my research paper for me for free canada Going further, the simile "like an unsuccessful literary man" is also creative, and is also protected. Please let me know if you have questions about this.
This page is intended to provide additional information about concepts in the page s it supplements. Correcting issues — step 1 Bring in other source s. technical writer sample test The sources and the article start with:. Going further, the simile "like an unsuccessful literary man" is also creative, and is also protected. Essays on building, editing, and deleting content.
Just two short sentences are close to the sources. Correcting issues — step 2 Read source information, preferably taking notes to extract essential points, and write a summary in your own words, thereby producing an acceptable version. quality writing services uae I'm afraid the [[ ArticleName ]] article you wrote may be a problem under our copyright policies, since the text seems very [[Wikipedia:
Importance of paraphrase virtually true what are the best resume writing services tennessee
This page is intended to provide additional information about concepts in the page s it supplements. Quotations should have in-text attribution and should be cited to their original source or author see WP: I'm afraid the [[ ArticleName ]] article you contributed to has parts which are very [[WP: Names or titles of people, organizations, books, films and so on may be given in full — there is no creative expression in a name or title, which is often the only way to identify the subject. Public domain content Non-free content Non-U.
Essays on building, editing, and deleting content Philosophy Articles must be written Avoid vague introductions Be a reliable source Cohesion Concede lost arguments Eight simple rules for editing our encyclopedia Don't lie Explanationism External criticism of Wikipedia Here to build an encyclopedia Most ideas are bad Need Neutrality of sources Not editing because of Wikipedia restriction Oversimplification Paradoxes Paraphrasing POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields Product, process, policy Purpose Systemic bias There is no seniority Ten Simple Rules for Editing Wikipedia Tendentious editing The role of policies in collaborative anarchy The rules are principles Trifecta Wikipedia in brief Wikipedia is an encyclopedia Wikipedia is a community. Quotation should not, however, be treated as an alternative to extracting facts and presenting them in plain language. It is acceptable to use a technical term such as "The War of the Spanish Succession" or "Relational Database Management System RDBMS " when the term is almost always used by sources that discuss the subject, and when such sources rarely use any other term.
Independent sources Trivial mentions. Another potential problem arises when a contributor copies or closely paraphrases a biased source either purposefully or without understanding the bias. However, if different sources use different terms for the concept, it may be best for the article to use a different term from the source or to include the term in a sourced quote. Consider the following example of a close paraphrase unacceptable version and ways to correct it to make an acceptable version:. The sources and the article start with:.
- college essay writers jet
- essay writer online marketing strategies
- essay writing software worksheets for college students
- purchase research paper butcher
- essay writing services law opinion poll
- help write a college paper me
- top essay writing websites guide
- dissertation assistance south africa
- online hotel reservation system thesis pdf
Need someone write my paper can i pay
It is sometimes relevant for an article to include a short quotation such as a significant statement made by the subject of the article or a notable comment about the subject. To avoid this risk, Wikipedia keeps this—like other non-free content—minimal. thesis topics in social work For example, consider two translations from the Turkish language:. For example, an alphabetical list of states in the US giving their name, size and population cannot be copyrighted.
Public domain sources and CC-BY-SA-compatible sources may be closely paraphrased, and limited close paraphrasing of copyrighted sources may also be permitted as fair use. The messages strive to avoid accusations while at the same time pointing to clear instructions on how to fix errors of this sort. online paper writing service yahoo answers About policies and guidelines Policies Guidelines How to contribute to Wikipedia guidance Policy writing is hard. Copyright problems Copyright owners who submitted their own work to Wikipedia or people editing on their behalf permission is provided]], we can use the original text with proper attribution. The original choice of words is part of Belloc's creative expression.
For instance, one may closely paraphrase another Wikipedia article or use content from another compatibly licensed user-generated wiki, so long as the content meets core content policies. Close paraphrasing closely paraphrased]] from [ source ]. thesis writing tips course outline Copyright problems Files for discussion Contributor copyright investigations. The Copyright Office cannot register claims to exclusive rights in brief combinations of words Another potential problem arises when a contributor copies or closely paraphrases a biased source either purposefully or without understanding the bias.
Thesis writing tips course outline
Another potential problem arises when a contributor copies or closely paraphrases a biased source either purposefully or without understanding the bias. Your approach here may depend upon the extensiveness of the issues you discover. Copyright problems Files for discussion Contributor copyright investigations. Even when content is verifiably public domain or released under a compatible free license , close paraphrasing may be at odds with Wikipedia's guideline related to plagiarism see Wikipedia:
It is of course also necessary that other requirements for copyright violation also exist, such as being a "substantial" taking. Close paraphrasing is the superficial modification of material from another source. Quotations should be used very sparingly [ vague ] and should be clearly identified and formatted as defined in MOS: See the talk page for details.